Personal Finance Tips

What's wrong microfinance? The interest rate.
I first heard about microfinance at a private equity summit from a man named Mike Murray. He was a keynote speaker and the Chairman of Unitus Capital. He was a very easy going person, a great guy that truly cared about helping people. He had made a bundle working with Bill Gates and Steven Ballmer at Microsoft. Instead of retiring, he pursued philanthropy.

He went on to describe microfinance and the power of helping people that needed small amounts of capital to lift themselves out of poverty. Because of the nature of the loans and the social structures the re-payment rate is very high (well above 90%). In a small village many of these loans were taken out in groups. The group structure provided the needed pressure for individuals to pay loans back. Most of the loans were for a short period of time; less than 90 days.

The problem with microfinance came when he discussed the interest rate they charged on these loans. A one month loan would have a 10% fee. These kinds of interest rates are still the norm even today.

APRs over 120%….Are you kidding me?

This summit was attended by MBAs from the best schools in the nation. Mike Murray seemed like a very nice person and very intelligent. Why wasn’t anyone asking the question about the absurd interest rate? If the default rate was higher I could understand the lending rate being higher. An annual percentage rate of 120% being sold as “helping end poverty” seemed wrong to me.

I love the idea of microfinance and helping entrepreneurs in 3rd world countries. Are there any microfinance organizations that don’t charge “pay day loan” type fees and interest rates?

Tagged with:
 

Billionaires Country of Origin
I’m reading Warren Buffets new book Snowball. It’s well written and interesting. Buffet is someone that I’ve always liked. Knowing more about his story made me curious about the nature of the super rich. After reading more on the Forbes Billionaire List I wanted to see how the top billionaires add up throughout the world.

Primarily I wanted to see the difference between self made and inherited wealth. Inherited wealth always seems like a cheap way to be included on this list. Those people that inherited their wealth didn’t have to work as hard for their money. As I looked through the pictures and read the stories of each billionaire it became evident that those billionaires that inherited their money are less attractive than those that had to earn it. I know that is really shallow but go take a look for yourself. You’ll likely come to the same conclusion.

The other thing that stood out to me is that the only women on the list inherited their fortunes, none of them earned their fortunes. Take that as you will but the fact remains. In the future this may change. 60 years ago segregation and all kinds of social prejudice ran rampant. Only time will tell if this will change.

Lastly, I looked for any correlation between countries that fostered entrepreneurs (thus having more self-made billionaires) and the average income per capita. Using PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) as a guide to the average person’s wealth I found some interesting factors.
Country PPP

1)The middle east had more self made billionaires that what I would have expected.
Middle East Riches People

2)The USA, Hong Kong, and the Middle East have about the same ratio of self made to inherited fortunes.
USA Richest People

hong-kong-richest-people

3)Europe and India both have similar ratios.
Europe's Richest People

Indias Richest People

4)Russia surprised me by even making the list. Changing from a communist to a free market government would make any inheritance impossible. As the couple generations pass their ratio should change.
russia-richest-people

Tagged with: